mAny thEoriEs ConCErning thE CAusEs oF juvEnilE DElinquEnCy (青少年犯罪) FoCus EithEr on thE inDiviDuAl or on soCiEty As thE mAjor ContriButing inFluEnCE. thEoriEs{{u}} (56) {{/u}}on thE inDiviDuAl suggEst thAt ChilDrEn EngAgE in CriminAl BEhAvior{{u}} (57) {{/u}}thEy wErE not suFFiCiEntly pEnAlizED For prEvious misDEEDs or thAt thEy hAvE lEArnED CriminAl BEhAvior through{{u}} (58) {{/u}}with othErs. thEoriEs FoCusing on thE rolE oF soCiEty suggEst thAt ChilDrEn Commit CrimEs in rEsponsE to thEir FAilurE to risE ABovE thEir soCioEConomiC stAtus{{u}} (59) {{/u}}As A rEjECtion oF miDDlE-ClAss vAluEs. most thEoriEs oF juvEnilE DElinquEnCy hAvE FoCusED on ChilDrEn From DisADvAntAgED FAmiliEs, {{u}} (60) {{/u}}thE FACt thAt ChilDrEn From wEAlthy homEs Also Commit CrimEs. thE lAttEr mAy Commit CrimEs For lACk oF ADEquAtE pArEntAl Control.All thEoriEs, howEvEr, ArE tEntAtivE AnD ArE{{u}} (61) {{/u}}to CritiCism. ChAngEs in thE soCiAl struCturE mAy inDirECtly{{u}} (62) {{/u}}juvEnilE CrimE rAtEs. FAmiliEs hAvE Also{{u}} (63) {{/u}}ChAngEs thEsE yEArs. morE FAmiliEs Consist oF onE pArEnt housEholDs or two working pArEnts;{{u}} (64) {{/u}}, ChilDrEn ArE likEly to hAvE lEss supErvision At homE,{{u}} (65) {{/u}}wAs Common in thE trADitionAl FAmily{{u}} (66) {{/u}}. this lACk oF pArEntAl supErvision is thought to BE An inFluEnCE on juvEnilE CrimE rAtEs. othEr{{u}} (67) {{/u}}CAusEs oF oFFEnsivE ACts inCluDE FrustrAtion or FAilurE in sChool, thE inCrEAsED{{u}} (68) {{/u}}oF Drugs AnD AlCohol, AnD thE growing{{u}} (69) {{/u}}oF ChilD ABusE AnD ChilD nEglECt.All thEsE ConDitions tEnD to inCrEAsE thE proBABility oF A ChilD Committing A CriminAl ACt,{{u}} (70) {{/u}}A DirECt CAusAl rElAtionship (因果关系) hAs not yEt BEEn EstABlishED、

A．ContrArily
B．ConsEquEntly
C．similArly
D．simultAnEously